Who's Online


Mammary Gland arrow Expression & Localization
Expression and Localization of Growth Factors during Mammary Gland Development

1.  INTRODUCTION

       The profound effects of systemic hormones on all aspects of pre- and postnatal development, differentiation and secretory activity of mammary gland are well documented. The cyclic events of mammary growth and differentiation that occur during pregnancy and lactation are controlled by various steroid and peptide hormones. At the cellular and tissue level the action of many of these hormones is mediated by growth factors in an intracrine, autocrine, juxtacrine or paracrine manner. In the present communication we report on the expression of various growth factors (IGF-I, IGF-II, FGF- 1, FGF-2, TGF-α) in the bovine mammary gland during well defined stages of mammogenesis, lactation and involution. Additionally the expression pattern of GHR during these stages will be discussed.

2.  MATERIAL AND METHODS

2.1  Animals, tissue sampling and preparation.

     Mammary tissue was obtained from 27 German Brown Swiss heifers and cows at distinct periods of mammary gland development immediately after slaughter. The material studied comprised mammary tissue from non-pregnant and primigravid heifers, cows during lactogenesis, early and late lactation and dry, non pregnant cows. The following classification of animals was established:I       Mammogenesis
I. 1 Mammogenesis-ductal growth (non pregnant heifers)
I.2 Mammogenesis-lobuloalveolar development during first pregnancy
I.2.1: days 194-213 of pregnancy I.2.2: days 255-272 of pregnancyII            Lactogenesis: days 5-11 post partumIII          Galactopoiesis 111.1  peak lactation111.2  late lactationIV  Involution (3-4 weeks dried off, non pregnant)
         For histology and immunohistochemistry, tissue samples (approximately
15 mm long and 5 mm thick) were fixed in Bouin's solution or in methanol/glacial acid (ratio 1:1, w/v) for 24 h, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, cleared in xylene and embedded in paraffin. Serial sections (5 µm) were cut on a Leitz microtome and mounted on glass slides. Following deparaffinization, the presence of growth factors (IGF-I, IGF-II, TGF-α, FGF-1, FGF-2, and receptors (FGFR and GHR) was demonstrated immunohistochemically by the streptavidin-biotin horseradish peroxidase complex (ABC) technique. Controls were performed by a) omission of the primary antibody; b) replacing the antiserum against the growth factors or FGFR and GHR by normal mouse serum (Sigma, Munich) in differentconcentrations (dilution 1:5; 1:10; 1:100). c) Preabsorption of the primary antibody. It was performed by preincubation of the primary antibody for 24 h at 40°C with the respective recombinant growth factors in a siliconized polypyrene tube before incubation on the slides.

2.2  RNA extraction

      Total RNA was isolated from bovine tissues using a specifically adapted guanidium thiocyanate/phenol procedure. The RNA pellet was washed in 75% ethanol and diluted in distilled, DEPC treated water. Concentration of RNA was measured by photometry. For RT-PCR of GHR, total RNA was prepared from snap frozen bovine mammary gland tissue using Tripure Reagent (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

2.3  Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction  (RT-PCR)      

       For RT-PCR, total cellular RNA was denatured at 65°C for 10 min, quick-cooled on ice and reverse transcribed in a final volume of 20 ml. When RNA had been prepared using snap-frozen tissue and Tripure Reagent, 5 mg RNA were used for the RT reaction. The RT reaction mix included 1x ExpandTM Reverse Transcriptase buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 40 mM MgCl2, 0.5% Tween 20 (v/v), pH 8.3), 10 mM DTT, 1.6 mg oligo dT, 0.75 mM dNTP, 3 mM MgCl2, 30 units RNase inhibitor and 50 units ExpandTM reverse transcriptase. All reagents were purchased from Boehringer Mannheim, Germany. The reaction mix contained 1x reaction buffer (10 mM Tris, 50 mM KCI, 1.5 mM MgCl2, pH 8.3), 0.4 mM dNTP, 4 units Taq polymerase (Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany) and 100 pmol of each primer. Controls were performed by using RNA instead of cDNA in the PCR reaction. The primers used for RT-PCR for the different growth factors and for GHR as well as the specific conditions of amplification are described previously.

2.4   RNase protection assay

   
The total RNA (30 mg) was introduced into a commercial RNase protection assay (RPA) (Ambion, Texas, USA) and performed as previously described4. Precast 10% polyacrylamide gels supplied with 7 M urea (Cleangels, Pharmacia, Freiburg, Germany) were used. Sense and 32P-antisense   riboprobes    were    generated   by   subcloning   of   the    desired
homologues gene products according to the manufacturer's instructions (PCR-Cloning and RNA-Transcription Kit; Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). To quantify the mRNA of the growth factors by RPA, increasing amounts of in vivo synthesized sense RNA were hybridised with the respective P-antisense riboprobes and compared with the mammary RNA sample using densitometry. There was a linear increase in the abundance of RNase-protected sense/antisense fragments between 0.25 and 5 pg. Individual samples were analysed to verify RT-PCR results and afterwards pooled RNA was examined to obtain the expression pattern throughout the different stages of mammary gland development.

 3.  RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

       Semiquantitative densitometric data of the RPA for different growth factors are given in table 1Table I: Ribonuclease protection assay of growth factors
 I.11.2.11.2.2IIIII.1111.2IV
 Mam.Mam.Mam.Lac.Galac.Galac.Invol.
IGF-1+++++ +---+- ++
TGFa++++---++
FGF-1++++++---+
FGF-2++++++++-+
FGFR+++++++±+



       A general tendency of the expression pattern during the different stages of mammary gland development can be seen. All growth factors studied displayed a relatively high expression in virgin heifers (I.1), reduced (IGF-I and TGF-α ) or equal levels (FGF-1 and FGF-2) during pregnancy (I.2.1 and I.2.2), negative or weak expression during lactogenesis (11) and galacto-poiesis (IIII.1 and III.2) and again increased levels during involution (IV). A similar distribution pattern was found with RT-PCR. Additionally, using RT-PCR, the growth factor IGF-II was demonstrated during all stages of mammary gland development but the tendency for a stronger expression during mammogenesis, as seen for the other growth factors, could not be proven for IGF-II.The immunohistochemical distribution pattern was studied for IGF-I, IGF-II, FGF-1 and FGF-2. The results for immunostaining of IGF-I are summarized in table 2. Only a weak staining for IGF-I occurred in the epithelium of the ducts during mammogenesis. The epithelium of the alveoli were negative during mammogenesis, lactogenesis and galactopoiesis but displayed distinct IGF-I activity during involution. In the stroma a distinct staining of the cytoplasm of adipocytes and of vascular smooth muscle cells could be observed. A certain percentage of fibroblasts (usually 20 to 30 %) were also immunopositive. Macrophages which occurred in various numbers during the different stages of mammary gland development (comparatively many during mammogenesis and involution, few during lactopoiesis and galactopoiesis) always showed a strong reaction for immunoreactive IGF-I. A similar pattern of immunoreactivity was found for FGF-1. Whereas mRNA for IGF-II could be demonstrated during all stages of mammary gland development using RT-PCR, no immunostaining was seen for this growth factor.Table 2: IGF-I Immunohistochemistry in bovine mammary gland


 I.1I.2.1I.2.2IIIII.1III.2IV
Epithelium Ducts++±+++++
AlveoliNo--±-+++
Myoepithelium-------
Stroma Fibroblasts Adipocytes+ +++ ++±+++few+++few no+few no+ ++
Endothelium Smooth muscle-++-++-+-++-+-+-+- ++-
Macrophages++++++++++++(few)+++(few)++++++(many)
     

       Immunoreactive FGF-2 was observed in virgin heifers in endothelial cells, ductal epithelial cells and myoepithelial cells. During mammogenesis positive immunostaining occurred additionally in the epithelium of some alveoli. During lactogenesis only endothelial and myoepithelial cells were immunopositive. During involution positive staining was again observed in vascular cells, fibroblasts, smooth muscle cells and myoepithelial cells. The pronounced localization of FGF-2 in the endothelial cells of the vascular system of the mammary gland suggests an important role of FGF-2 in the changes of vascularization during the mammogenesis, lactation and involution.

         
          The physiological role of GH for mammogenesis and lactation is not fully known and especially the role of GHR is controversial discussed. Using RT-PCR, non radioactive in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemistry we could demonstrate a characteristic pattern of GHR expression in the epithelial and stromal compartments of the bovine mammary gland (Table 3)

      
The ductular epithelium showed distinct staining during most stages of development. The secretory epithelium of the alveoli contained a moderate amount of GHR during pregnancy which significantly increased during lactation and galactopoiesis. In dry cows the immunostaining for GHR in the alveoli was only weak or negative. Contrary to the GHR protein, the amount of mRNA encoding GHR appeared to be relatively constant during mammogenesis and lactation and with in situ hybridization a distinct signal for GHR was found in the epithelial cells of ducts and alveoli during this stages.

Table 3: GHR-immunohistochemistry in bovine mammary gland
 I.1I.2.11.2.2IIIII.1III.2IV
Epithelium       
Ducts+++ - +++- +++- +++++++/-
AlveoliNo+++ - +++++++/-
Myoepithelium+/-------
Stroma       
Fibroblasts10-20% +10-20% ++++++(few)
Adipocytes+++ - +++- +++- ++nono+
Endothelium++ - +++- ++++++
Smooth muscle++++++++++++++
Macrophages++++++++++++ (few)+++ (few)++++++ (many)



       Even though an important role for GH in maintaining milk yield in ruminants is well established the precise mechanisms of its actions in the mammary gland is unclear as GHR appears to lack in this organ. Proposals for GH action includes homeostatic mechanisms such as changes in energy partitioning and suggestions that GH increases milk production indirectly via stimulation of IGF-I production, either in the liver or locally in the mammary gland, which in turn increases milk production. Our results clearly point to a direct role of GH via its receptor. Using different techniques (RT-PCR, in situ hybridisation, immunocytochemistry) we could demonstrate a distinct amount of mRNA encoding GHR and its receptor protein during lactation and galactopoiesis whereas at the same time. the amount of IGF-I appeared to be low or negative in the glandular epithelium. and only weakly expressed in the stroma.

 
© 2008 Mammary Gland
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.
JoomSEF SEO by Artio.
TOPlist Directory Top Baby Names
eXTReMe Tracker
gesundheit-entspannung B Y R M P